We answer that question in the negative and conclude that the condemning authority is responsible for such roll-back taxes. The narrow issue that we address on this appeal is whether a property owner-condemnee is responsible for roll-back taxes when the use of such property is changed as a result of a condemnation. The opinion of the court was delivered by Respondent Township of South Brunswick did not file a brief. Gaynor argued the cause for respondent Cody Ann Eckert. Gladstone argued the cause for respondents Ruth Cody Eckert, Janice Lee Eckert, Seymour Lifschutz and Phillis Lenore Lifschutz.ĭavid B. Carroll argued the cause for appellant (Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, attorneys Mr. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. 238, 824 A.2d 1132.īefore Judges Conley, Carchman and Parrillo.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |